On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Will Moss <wm...@bu.mp> wrote: > This is very cool--glad you guys decided to bundle this in. The linked post > and the Google Code page both suggest that it will have a much more > efficient on-disk representation than InnoDB, do you have an specific > numbers on overhead per key?
I don't think we've officially measured it; in my own tests, it's quite small. A 10GB dataset was within a few MB of what I expected. Certainly FAR more efficient than Inno (where I've seen 2-3x). D. -- Dave Smith Director, Engineering Basho Technologies, Inc. diz...@basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
