I am considering using Riaksearch to replace a project that currently makes use of lucene. This project extensively uses 'AND' queries to return a very small subset of the total document store. Given that riaksearch provides a "solr" endpoint, I would have expected the queries to return the same results, but that does not appear to be the case.
I created a simple test containing three documents (described here as xml): <doc> <field name="id">1</field> <field name="topping_text">strawberry</field> <field name="base_text">pastry</field> </doc> <doc> <field name="id">2</field> <field name="topping_text">blueberry</field> <field name="base_text">waffle</field> </doc> <doc> <field name="id">3</field> <field name="topping_text">strawberry</field> <field name="base_text">pancake</field> </doc> I ran a few queries against this set of docs: search-cmd search menu_index "topping_text:\"strawberry\"" ** This returns 2 documents search-cmd search menu_index "topping_text:\"strawberry\" and base_text:\"pastry\"" ** This returns 2 documents, I think it should only return menu_index/1 search-cmd search menu_index "topping_text:\"strawberry\" and base_text:\"waffles\"" ** This returns 3 documents, it shouldn't return any For comparions sake, I ran the same queries against lucene and retrieved the results I expected. I've uploaded my documents, the commands I used to create an index, and the sample lucene java code to: https://github.com/vijedi/Riak-Search--And--Query-Test Have I misinterpreted what is happening or is there a real difference here? Thanks! Tejus Parikh tejusparikh.com | @vi_jedi
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
