That was my post re: large ring_creation_size. I can imagine having more than 50 nodes, as discussed in that thread. :)
But my question about riak's behavior after a node joins applies for any ring_creation_size... Sent from my iPhone On May 2, 2011, at 7:13 PM, sicul...@gmail.com wrote: > Search the list for a lengthy discussion on very large ring_creation_size. > I'm wagering that 2048 is too large. If you can't imagine having more than 50 > physical nodes your size should not be more than 512. > > Cheers, > Alexander > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Nelson <gro...@dropcam.com> > Sender: riak-users-boun...@lists.basho.com > Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 18:48:36 > To: <riak-users@lists.basho.com> > Subject: 'not found' after join > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
