Thanks Joseph. I'll take a closer look at the mailing list archives before
shooting a mail to the list.
The code that you pointed to is in Erlang and is muchly cryptic :)
Is there a python equivalent, or is the logic explained somewhere so that I
don't misunderstand the erlang code?
--
Thanks,
Ishwar
Just another resurrected Neozoic Archosaur comics.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mojosaurus/sets/72157600257724083/
>________________________________
>From: Joseph Lambert <joseph.g.lamb...@gmail.com>
>To: Ishwar <ishwarsridha...@yahoo.com>
>Cc: "riak-users@lists.basho.com" <riak-users@lists.basho.com>
>Sent: Friday, April 8, 2011 3:09 PM
>Subject: Re: PBC API: Generating key for an object
>
>
>Hi Ishwar,
>
>
>There was a good thread about this in the mailing list, you can check it
>here: http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-March/003494.html
>
>- Joe Lambert
>
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Ishwar <ishwarsridha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Riak folks,
>>
>>
>>I see that storing an object without a key is supported in the HTTP
>>APIs(http://wiki.basho.com/REST-API.html#Store-a-new-object-without-a-key),
>>but not in the PBC APIs(http://wiki.basho.com/PBC-API.html) or the python
>>client(http://basho.github.com/riak-python-client/).
>>
>>
>>Is there a reason why this is so?
>>
>>
>>We're planning to use the ID generated by Riak as the identifier in the
>>system, and ideally wouldn't want to use HTTP APIs for creation, and PBC APIs
>>for read/updates.
>>
>>--
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Ishwar
>>
>>
>>Just another resurrected Neozoic Archosaur comics.
>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mojosaurus/sets/72157600257724083/
>>_______________________________________________
>>riak-users mailing list
>>riak-users@lists.basho.com
>>http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
