Ya, my original message just highlighted the standard 0,1,5 that most
people/hardware should know/be able to support. There are better
options and 10 would be one of them.
@siculars on twitter
http://siculars.posterous.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 22, 2011, at 8:43, Ryan Zezeski <rzeze...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com
> wrote:
Save your ops dudes the headache and just use raid 5 and be done
with it.
Depending on the number of disks available I might even argue
running software RAID 10 for better throughput and less chance of
data loss (as long as you can afford to cut your avail storage in
half on every machine). It's not too hard to setup on modern Linux
distros (mdadm); at least I was doing it 5 years ago and I'm no sys
admin.
-Ryan
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
