Why don't you use Membase/Couchbase instead? It provides the same capability as memcached but adds clustering capability on top of it.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Mike Stoddart <sto...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was thinking of using memcached for cheap, fast storage to share > between servers. I need to store stuff like user preferences, > permissions, session etc. But memcached (I think) requires you to > define which servers you want to use for storage. Ideally I don't > care. I want my core/auth server to write preferences and permissions > to the cache and let tornado on other servers pull those keys out. I > think Riak could perform this in theory, but is Riak fast enough? -- http://twitter.com/jpartogi _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
