I know that the fine folks at Basho are looking into implementing secondary indexes, however secondary indexes are difficult to implement in Riak. Riak isn't aware of how you're storing your data, so it could be JSON, XML, plain text, or some kind of binary data. I wrote about a naive implementation of inverted indexes in Riak ( http://facility9.com/2010/12/16/secondary-indexes-how-would-you-do-it). There's a lot to consider; it's not surprising that they are taking the time to do it right.
Jeremiah Peschka Microsoft SQL Server MVP MCITP: Database Developer, DBA On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Joshua Partogi <jpart...@scrum8.com> wrote: > Hi Runar, > > Is that official from Basho? It looks like it's only a comment. > > Kind regards, > Joshua > > On Friday, February 4, 2011, Runar Jordahl <runar.jord...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think Alexander sums it up very well. But there are plans for > > secondary indices: > > > > http://blog.epigent.com/2010/12/riak-considers-secondary-indices.html > > > > Runar > > > > 2011/2/4 Joshua Partogi <joshua.j...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> In riak, is it possible to query a range of data in a bucket instead of > >> fetching all of them? If it is possible, what parameter that we need to > >> specify? > > > > -- > http://twitter.com/jpartogi > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
