Without knowing exactly, I'm gonna go with yes. I happen to be under the impression that the merge_index_backend is a bitcask derivative. But I would love to hear otherwise from someone @basho.
-Alexander Sicular @siculars On Jan 22, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Gordon Tillman wrote: > Greetings All, > > It is my understanding the only backend that is compatible with Riak Search > indexes is the merge_index_backend. > > I am wondering if merge_index backend has a similar memory footprint as > bitcask; i.e., must the keydir structure for merge_index fit entirely in RAM > as is the case with bitcask? > > Many thanks! > > --gordon > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
