Agreed. So it therefore makes sense to start using the PBC from the outset, allowing for future moving of the client app off any cluster node(s) it might be residing on, as well as not being affecting by any subtle changes to the internals of the riak_kv code base (specifically the non-PB modules).
On 20 Jan 2011, at 9:37 PM, Mojito Sorbet wrote: > To me the major concern is that if you use the native (non-PB) > interface, your application cluster and the Riak cluster become merged > into one big Erlang cluster. The number of TCP connections can start > getting out of hand, and the work put on the cluster manager starts to > become significant. > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
