+1 on what OJ is saying. The way you were first doing it is joining dev1 to a ring named dev2@127.0.0.1 and then attempting to join dev1 to a ring named dev3@127.0.0.1
Jeremiah Peschka Microsoft SQL Server MVP MCITP: Database Developer, DBA On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:00 AM, OJ Reeves <o...@buffered.io> wrote: > I've always gone about it the other way: > > dev2/bin/riak-admin join dev1 > dev3/bin/riak-admin join dev1 > > Hasn't failed me yet :-) > > OJ > > Sent from my Windows Phone From: 吴磊 > Sent: Monday, 17 January 2011 8:46 PM > To: riak-users@lists.basho.com > Subject: Joining running nodes should be in proper order? > When I join nodes like this: > dev1/bin/riak-admin join dev2@127.0.0.1 > dev1/bin/riak-admin join dev3@127.0.0.1 > > the ring has only 2 nodes: dev1 & dev2. I wait about 30 minutes, > nothing changed. > So I must join the ring nodes in some proper order? > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
