Hi Rusty, Looking forward to it coming out, exactly the use case I was hoping to have it for. -- Jebu Ittiachen j...@jebu.net
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Rusty Klophaus <ru...@basho.com> wrote: > Hi Jebu, > > Inline fields are a partially implemented feature that we hope to expose > soon, but are currently not supported. The basic idea, once released, is > that marking a field in your schema as inline changes the way that field is > stored in the index, allowing you to use the inline field to quickly filter > results at the expense of a larger index. > > A good use case for this is a low cardinality field like "gender". Indexing > on gender is useless, since roughly 50% will be male and 50% will be female. > If you define gender as an inline field, Search will store the gender as a > property in the index for other fields, and then rewrite the query > appropriately. This is an advanced feature, but one that could lead to > significant query performance boosts depending on the data model. > > Again, inline fields are not yet supported, but this is the general idea. > > Best, > Rusty > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Jebu Ittiachen <j...@jebu.net> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I see references to inline fields in the riak search schema and search >> code but dont see it documented anywhere. Nor does the parser seem to >> support it. Could someone shed more light on this, from the implementation >> in search_op_term looks like it could be very useful. >> >> -- >> Jebu Ittiachen >> j...@jebu.net >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
