Yes, it's only for the keys that the node is responsible for. On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Tony Novak <t...@dapper.net> wrote:
> Quick question about Riak's memory footprint: I know that Bitcask > requires all keys to fit in memory. Does this mean only the keys that > reside on a given node, or does each node hold the keys of the entire > system? I assume it's the former, but I just want to be sure. > > Basically what I'm trying to figure out is whether we should expect > better performance from a cluster of N nodes with 2*M GB of memory > each, or 2*N nodes with M GB each. _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
