Please file an issue in bugzilla (http://issues.basho.com) with either a patch, or a reference to a git or mercurial repo. I can't guarantee that we'll accept every patch, but I do promise to give it a serious review.
Thanks. :) D. On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Lev Walkin <v...@lionet.info> wrote: > Do you have a robust policy of accepting outside patches? > > On Oct 7, 2010, at 6:47 PM, David Smith wrote: > >>> make_ref is 6 times faster than erlang:phash2(make_ref()) which is 50% >>> faster than erlang:phash2(now()). >>> >>> Of course, in the grand scheme of things this might not be your biggest >>> bottleneck, but why hashing now() when there exsists an idiomatic >>> make_ref() >>> solution? Am I missing something? >> >> You're not missing anything, I think. make_ref() seems like a logical >> and reasonable alternative. As you said, however, it's not (anywhere >> near) our biggest bottleneck -- last time I ran the profiler it didn't >> even show up in the top 100 hotspots. :) >> >> Thanks, >> >> D. > > -- > vlm > > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
