I imagine that if you can afford clusters in multiple datacenters then you should be able to afford EnterpriseDS. Or is it prohibitively expensive?
I have no idea. But afaics that's Basho's revenue model. Francisco 2010/10/5 Jason J. W. Williams <jasonjwwilli...@gmail.com>: > Maybe the community can come up with a solution for those of us that can't > afford or yet justify EnterpriseDS. > > -J > > Sent via iPhone > > Is your e-mail Premiere? > > On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:40, Dean Cookson <cook...@basho.com> wrote: > >> Andrew, >> The best way to do what you describe is to have a cluster in each datacenter >> with the multi-cluster replication feature from the EnterpriseDS version of >> Riak running between them. Replication will automatically propagate writes >> in both directions and will give you the local access performance you need. >> We recommend against having a single cluster span data centers as any given >> cluster really needs to share a low-latency network. >> >> Best regards, >> Dean >> >> -- >> Dean Cookson >> VP Business Development >> Basho Technologies, Inc. >> Google Voice: +1 415 692 1775 >> Skype: photo_luddite >> cook...@basho.com >> >> >> On Oct 4, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> The Dynamo replication scheme allows one to specify how many nodes a >>> change should be propagated to. But what if I want a change to be >>> (eventually) propagated to each and every machine in the cluster? >>> I can't simply specify a fixed number of nodes to replicate to, >>> because, in the general case, this is time-varying. My use case is a >>> multi-datacenter cluster with a low read latency requirement for >>> certain records (thus those records need to be present in each >>> datacenter, if not even on each machine). >>> >>> Is this currently possible, or would it require a patch? Or would this >>> be too difficult to implement with the current architecture? This >>> seems to be a problem common to all databases using the Dynamo >>> replication scheme... or is it? Thoughts? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andrew >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
