Thanks for the info. I saw the java one already, but I noticed it said the API isn't quite complete yet. :) Put me down for a vote on PBC support on official java client. Most of our backend stuff is Java. We use the official client lib with groovy.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Sean Cribbs <s...@basho.com> wrote: > Yes, protobuffs is the fastest interface, but you can also use Python (for > which the PBC was originally written), Java, or Ruby. > > Python: http://bitbucket.org/basho/riak-python-client/src > Java: http://github.com/krestenkrab/riak-java-pb-client/ > Ruby: http://github.com/aitrus/riak-pbclient > > More officially supported clients will be getting the PBC option in the near > future. > > Sean Cribbs <s...@basho.com> > Developer Advocate > Basho Technologies, Inc. > http://basho.com/ > > On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Wilson MacGyver wrote: > >> There are various riak clients out there right now. >> Some official, some not. Most are http REST based. >> >> as far as I know, the erlang native client is the only prototocol buffer >> based version. >> >> I remember hearing that protocol buffer version is about 10x faster >> than HTTP. >> >> so if I want to bulk load a lot of data, is using erlang client the fastest >> way? >> >> -- >> Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > -- Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum. _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
