Interesting. Makes sense. -J
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Sean Cribbs <s...@basho.com> wrote: > Correct, the vector clocks would not necessarily be the same. > > Sean Cribbs <s...@basho.com> > Developer Advocate > Basho Technologies, Inc. > http://basho.com/ > > On May 26, 2010, at 11:47 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: > >> Are you saying sending the write to two clusters in the client >> wouldn't end up with the same data in both? I assume that's because it >> wouldn't guarantee the same conflict resolution on both? >> >> -J >> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Sean Cribbs <s...@basho.com> wrote: >>> We don't know of anyone doing replication between clusters in a fashion >>> other than the tools we provide in EnterpriseDS. Just playing the write to >>> both clusters via an intermediary probably won't have the effect you desire. >>> >>> Sean Cribbs <s...@basho.com> >>> Developer Advocate >>> Basho Technologies, Inc. >>> http://basho.com/ >>> >>> On May 26, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Given replication is a built-in feature only in the EnterpriseDS >>>> product, how are folks using only the open source version of Riak >>>> handling replication? Writing to two clusters simultaneously or >>>> something else perhaps? >>>> >>>> Thank you in advance. >>>> >>>> -J >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> riak-users mailing list >>>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
