Something in one of the updates over the last year (which depending on your 
distro may have only just got to you) has played havoc with many of the 
plugins. If I use one of my favourite ones I have the same issue as your friend 
of it taking minutes to open and being slow. My library is roughly half that 
size. I'd suggest turning off every single plugin and seeing if it makes a 
difference, if it's good like that then turn them back on one at a time.

________________________________________
From: rhythmbox-devel <rhythmbox-devel-boun...@gnome.org> on behalf of Sam 
Geeraerts <sam...@elmundolibre.be>
Sent: 09 January 2020 19:11
To: rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Snappier navigation

On 08/01/20 23:01, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> Does this person make use of a screen reader, or some other accessibility
> technology?  These have pretty significant performance impacts for
> applications that use large tables.

No.

> On my six year old laptop, rhythmbox takes about two seconds to start
> with a similarly sized library, and there's no appreciable delay in switching
> between playlists.

Interesting. So it's not Rhythmbox's fault. The thing is, I've seen it
run equally slow on another machine. At the time I blamed that machine's
low specs, but the current machine should be up to the job.

I'll check if --debug can tell me anything new.

This person has all audio files pretty much lumped in ~/Music, with
hardly any subfolders. Could that affect performance?
_______________________________________________
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
_______________________________________________
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
rhythmbox-devel@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel

Reply via email to