Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2940#discussion_r19506776
  
    --- Diff: 
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/receiver/ReceivedBlockHandler.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
    +package org.apache.spark.streaming.receiver
    +
    +import java.nio.ByteBuffer
    +
    +import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
    +import scala.concurrent.{Await, ExecutionContext, Future}
    +import scala.concurrent.duration._
    +import scala.language.{existentials, postfixOps}
    +
    +import WriteAheadLogBasedBlockHandler._
    +import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration
    +import org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path
    +import org.apache.spark.{SparkException, Logging, SparkConf}
    +import org.apache.spark.storage.{BlockManager, StorageLevel, StreamBlockId}
    +import org.apache.spark.streaming.util.{Clock, SystemClock, 
WriteAheadLogManager}
    +import org.apache.spark.util.Utils
    +
    +private[streaming] sealed trait ReceivedBlock
    +private[streaming] case class ArrayBufferBlock(arrayBuffer: 
ArrayBuffer[_]) extends ReceivedBlock
    +private[streaming] case class IteratorBlock(iterator: Iterator[_]) extends 
ReceivedBlock
    +private[streaming] case class ByteBufferBlock(byteBuffer: ByteBuffer) 
extends ReceivedBlock
    +
    +
    +/** Trait that represents a class that handles the storage of blocks 
received by receiver */
    +private[streaming] trait ReceivedBlockHandler {
    +
    +  /** Store a received block with the given block id */
    +  def storeBlock(blockId: StreamBlockId, receivedBlock: ReceivedBlock): 
Option[AnyRef]
    --- End diff --
    
    I wanted to have a single clean interface out here (kind of like 
BlockStore, used in BlockManager, which is the base for MemoryStore, DiskStore, 
TachyonStore). We have only two implementation now, but in future there can be 
other implementations. For example, one may want to log to Cassandra, which 
will require a third implementation CassandraBasedBlockHandler. Hence I dont 
want the return type to have a specific type as the return type will be 
specific to the implementation. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to