Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7177#discussion_r33747859
  
    --- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/clustering.py ---
    @@ -282,18 +282,30 @@ class PowerIterationClusteringModel(JavaModelWrapper, 
JavaSaveable, JavaLoader):
     
         Model produced by [[PowerIterationClustering]].
     
    -    >>> data = [(0, 1, 1.0), (0, 2, 1.0), (1, 3, 1.0), (2, 3, 1.0),
    -    ...     (0, 3, 1.0), (1, 2, 1.0), (0, 4, 0.1)]
    +    >>> data = [(0, 1, 1.0), (0, 2, 1.0), (0, 3, 1.0), (1, 2, 1.0), (1, 3, 
1.0),
    +    ... (2, 3, 1.0), (3, 4, 0.1), (4, 5, 1.0), (4, 15, 1.0), (5, 6, 1.0),
    +    ... (6, 7, 1.0), (7, 8, 1.0), (8, 9, 1.0), (9, 10, 1.0), (10, 11, 1.0),
    +    ... (11, 12, 1.0), (12, 13, 1.0), (13, 14, 1.0), (14, 15, 1.0)]
         >>> rdd = sc.parallelize(data, 2)
         >>> model = PowerIterationClustering.train(rdd, 2, 100)
         >>> model.k
         2
    +    >>> result = sorted(model.assignments().collect(), key=lambda x: x.id)
    +    >>> sum([x.cluster != result[3].cluster for x in result if x.id < 3])
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, I agree to keep it simple. But the output of the following code is not 
determinate. 
    ```>>> sorted(model.assignments().collect(), key=lambda x: x.id)```
    It can only ensure ids [0-3] and [4-15] are clustered into two group, but 
the group id is not determinate. So output the assignments directly is not a 
good idea.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to