beliefer commented on code in PR #52451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/52451#discussion_r2380700805


##########
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/v2Commands.scala:
##########
@@ -915,12 +915,13 @@ object MergeIntoTable {
       matchedActions: Iterable[MergeAction],
       notMatchedActions: Iterable[MergeAction],
       notMatchedBySourceActions: Iterable[MergeAction]): 
Seq[TableWritePrivilege] = {
-    val privileges = 
scala.collection.mutable.HashSet.empty[TableWritePrivilege]
-    (matchedActions.iterator ++ notMatchedActions ++ 
notMatchedBySourceActions).foreach {
-      case _: DeleteAction => privileges.add(TableWritePrivilege.DELETE)
-      case _: UpdateAction | _: UpdateStarAction => 
privileges.add(TableWritePrivilege.UPDATE)
-      case _: InsertAction | _: InsertStarAction => 
privileges.add(TableWritePrivilege.INSERT)
-    }
+    val privileges = (matchedActions ++ notMatchedActions ++ 
notMatchedBySourceActions)
+      .collect {
+        case _: DeleteAction => TableWritePrivilege.DELETE
+        case _: UpdateAction | _: UpdateStarAction => 
TableWritePrivilege.UPDATE
+        case _: InsertAction | _: InsertStarAction => 
TableWritePrivilege.INSERT
+      }
+      .toSet

Review Comment:
   @LuciferYang You said right. But the size of actions here is very small. We 
can ignore the factor that extra traversal. The main performance factor here is 
create sets.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to