LuciferYang commented on PR #49411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49411#issuecomment-2626294131

   > * Based on that the root cause for the performance regression of 
`SubExprEliminationBenchmark` is not due to the codegen implementation of 
`from_json`(the root cause is that the operator `FilterExEc` did not implement 
`SubExprElimination` optimization in `WSC`), this PR will close here.
   > * The operator `FilterExec` implementing `SubExprElimination` optimization 
in `WSC` is still being explored for implementation: [[Only Test][Don't Review] 
Make `FilterExec` to support `subexpressionElimination` in the codegen scenario 
#49573](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49573)
   
   
   @panbingkun  is currently on vacation. According to @panbingkun's intention, 
if `FilterExec` supports subexpressionElimination in the codegen scenario, this 
pr would not be needed. BUt, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49573 is 
still under development.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to