cloud-fan commented on code in PR #49340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49340#discussion_r1907062737


##########
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala:
##########
@@ -103,8 +106,10 @@ object TypeCoercion extends TypeCoercionBase {
     // [SPARK-50060] If a binary operation contains two collated string types 
with different
     // collation IDs, we can't decide which collation ID the result should 
have.
     case (st1: StringType, st2: StringType) if st1.collationId != 
st2.collationId => None
-    case (st: StringType, t2: AtomicType) if t2 != BinaryType && t2 != 
BooleanType => Some(st)
-    case (t1: AtomicType, st: StringType) if t1 != BinaryType && t1 != 
BooleanType => Some(st)
+    case (st: StringType, t2: AtomicType) if t2 != BinaryType && t2 != 
BooleanType &&
+      StringHelper.isPlainString(st) => Some(st)
+    case (t1: AtomicType, st: StringType) if t1 != BinaryType && t1 != 
BooleanType &&
+      StringHelper.isPlainString(st) => Some(st)

Review Comment:
   if `col` is varchar type, `col + 1` is not allowed. Is it really what we 
want? It's a breaking change because previously we rewrite char/varchar to 
string type and `col + 1` is allowed.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to