-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/67003/#review202661
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [67003]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' 
CONFIGURATION='--verbose --disable-libtool-wrappers' ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 
MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker-build.sh

- Mesos Reviewbot


On May 8, 2018, 11:59 a.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/67003/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 8, 2018, 11:59 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Greg Mann.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-8892
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8892
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The test `ReconcileDroppedOperation` uses detection of a
> `ReconcileOperationsMessage` to confirm correct agent reregistration
> behavior. For that it drops an operation on its way to the agent, and
> then tries to observe the `ReconcileOperationsMessage` when the agent
> reregisters after a simulated master failover.
> 
> Since `ReconcileOperationsMessage` is sent whenever the master detects
> discrepancy between its own operation state of the agent and the
> information sent by the agent in an `UpdateSlaveMessage` we need to
> make sure to only drop the operation once the agent has sent the
> update which is part of its initial registration sequence.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/master_slave_reconciliation_tests.cpp 
> 937bab08c9bef1a2a6a400979dcf0895412168f5 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/67003/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check`
> 
> Ran the test in repetition under heavy (simulated) load for several thousand 
> iterations without failing; before this patch it would fail after a couple 
> dozen iterations.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Bannier
> 
>

Reply via email to