----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66228/#review202532 -----------------------------------------------------------
include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto Lines 479 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/66228/#comment284323> Should we document the 200 OK response somewhere? - Benjamin Mahler On April 20, 2018, 8:19 p.m., Kapil Arya wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/66228/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 20, 2018, 8:19 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler and Till Toenshoff. > > > Bugs: MESOS-7258 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7258 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added Call for updating framework info. > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/scheduler/scheduler.proto > f6a780a7b75878b9e74402a28a25bb868f7ac36f > include/mesos/v1/scheduler/scheduler.proto > fcfec5e417463103e98dd6917722b4fde41cac7c > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66228/diff/8/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Kapil Arya > >
