----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65905/#review198625 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Let's link Apache's recommendation to go for SHA512 as found under http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#sha-checksum in the commit description please. Also when using links, please avoid linking the word "here" and instead use e.g. "Official Apache signing recommandation" as the linked term -- e.g. screen readers play much nicer that way. - Till Toenshoff On March 5, 2018, 1:43 p.m., Benjamin Bannier wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65905/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 5, 2018, 1:43 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Kapil Arya, Till Toenshoff, and Vinod Kone. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Apache now requires SHA checksum files instead of the previously > required MD5, see [here](1). This patch updates the Mesos vote and > release tooling to accommodate that change in policy. > > [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums > > > Diffs > ----- > > support/release.sh 3aeda92e6bd48683cf609fa527633cd47b9f7dce > support/vote.sh 649eebc6b5fe1b3783ae0c2c1706f1349ddc436c > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65905/diff/1/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Benjamin Bannier > >
