> On Feb. 7, 2018, 6:19 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > src/tests/mock_slave.cpp > > Lines 107-108 (original), 107-109 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65497/diff/2/?file=1953432#file1953432line107> > > > > What's going on here? > > Meng Zhu wrote: > For the agent failover test, I need the failed agent to start with the > same pid. There is a parameter `id` you can pass to the Slave constructor > above. But it turns out the original code ignore that argument and just call > `process::ID::generate("slave")` every time, changed it to take the argument. > > Benjamin Mahler wrote: > I see, so this was a bug? Can you fix this in a separate patch? > > I also didn't follow why you needed to add the `ProcessBase` constructor > call, since that's done within the slave constructor already? What does it > mean for it to happen twice?
OK, separate patch for `id` initialization in #65613. > On Feb. 7, 2018, 6:19 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > src/tests/slave_tests.cpp > > Lines 4926-4927 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65497/diff/2/?file=1953433#file1953433line4926> > > > > even after the exeutor has been registered..? I think you want to > > remove that? > > Meng Zhu wrote: > Why? The agent failover happens after the executor has been registered. > Then the executor re-registers and got killed. > > Benjamin Mahler wrote: > Oh I read it as the executor being registered after failover rather than > before, how about: > > ``` > // This test verifies that if an agent fails over after registering > // a v1 executor but before delivering its initial task groups, the > // executor will be shut down since all of its initial task groups > // were dropped. See MESOS-8411. > ``` > > This also avoids the hanging sentence at the end that mentions task group > by stating it within the description. Sounds good. Thank you! > On Feb. 7, 2018, 6:19 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > src/tests/slave_tests.cpp > > Lines 4945 (patched) > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/65497/diff/2/?file=1953433#file1953433line4945> > > > > "NotSlave"? > > > > We should probably have found a way to use the logic from > > Master::newSlaveId here. > > Meng Zhu wrote: > Changed it to "slave". That we will need to change cluster::master, I do > not think it is important here. Let's just use "slave". > > Benjamin Mahler wrote: > Oh, I mistook this for the SlaveID rather than the PID::id. I'm not sure > I followed your response, but re-using the master code isn't applicable here > anyway. > > To avoid this confusion for other readers, can you do the following? > > ``` > string processId = process::ID::generate("slave"); > > StartSlave(..., processId, ...); > ``` Sounds good. - Meng ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65497/#review197070 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 12, 2018, 11:48 a.m., Meng Zhu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/65497/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 12, 2018, 11:48 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Benjamin Mahler. > > > Bugs: MESOS-8411 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8411 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > This test verifies that the v1 executor is shutdown if all of its > initial tasks could not be delivered when re-subscribing with > a recovered agent. See MESOS-8411. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/tests/mesos.hpp c5593c25dde18c005f195a1885a8586bc72c849f > src/tests/mesos.cpp ac789297d6aa034121b73e4efc0aafee1ee3b60f > src/tests/slave_tests.cpp 628b0d0fc862264c9553e1660c7df548df9cd4a1 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/65497/diff/4/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Meng Zhu > >
