-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/59434/#review175652
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/master/master.cpp
Lines 5615 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/59434/#comment249001>

    This basically duplicates the INFO message below. Why do we need both?



src/master/master.cpp
Line 5946 (original), 5955 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/59434/#comment249002>

    This basically duplicates the INFO message on line 6127. Why do we need 
both?


- James Peach


On May 22, 2017, 5:38 a.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/59434/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 22, 2017, 5:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and James Peach.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - On the agent (re)-registration code paths.
> - Could be helpful for triaging performance issues.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/master.cpp 02affe2d6dc76ef91363df04d8d8cbed3beaf34f 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/59434/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to