> On Feb. 21, 2017, 11:20 p.m., Zhitao Li wrote: > > docs/upgrades.md, lines 252-260 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/diff/1/?file=1640650#file1640650line252> > > > > 1. Is the order of these actions matter? I recall we specifically say > > order of upgrading each component does not mater, so I'm interested in why > > this is being explicitly called out; > > 2. Is this specific to 1.1.x -> 1.2.x upgrade, or serves just a general > > guideline regardless of versions? (if former, maybe call out the reason; if > > latter, maybe move to a different location). > > Adam B wrote: > 1. We generally recommend upgrading masters before agents (and rebuilding > modules before either). > 2. This is nothing new to 1.2.x, and is actually included in each > release's section (except 1.1.x). The order/recommendation doesn't usually > change much, although it has evolved as we have added modules and clarified > the need for scheduler/executor upgrades.
Thanks for the clarification. - Zhitao ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/#review166262 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 21, 2017, 7:57 a.m., Adam B wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 21, 2017, 7:57 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added upgrade guide for 1.2.x. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/upgrades.md 74f4367020d7025bdcfbbf50a166a644ee5050bc > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56867/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Adam B > >
