> On June 6, 2016, 2:52 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/upgrades.md, line 173
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/48272/diff/1/?file=1406841#file1406841line173>
> >
> >     This section seems like duplicate of what we have in CHANGELOG. What do 
> > you think about removing this text from here and just point the table 
> > entries above to CHANGELOG?
> 
> Joerg Schad wrote:
>     I actually considered that, but decided against it for the following 
> reason:
>     IMO this document is for operators who want to understand what might be 
> problematic when upgrading between different version (which by natures 
> duplicates some information from the CHANGELOG). Also the table should be 
> just optional, so those changes should be mentioned in the "0.28 ->  1.0" 
> section as well as in the table.
> 
> Vinod Kone wrote:
>     Why can't operators look at CHANGELOG? Everything in the Deprecations 
> section in CHANGELOG should be something the operators should be aware of. Is 
> there stuff in upgrades.md that is not in CHANGELOG?

lets cleanup CHANGELOG and upgrades.md in a follow up patch.


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48272/#review136258
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 6, 2016, 3:26 p.m., Joerg Schad wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/48272/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 6, 2016, 3:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Mesos 1.0 changed need to be reflected in upgrades.md.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/upgrades.md be6db7d1c70e893bf74075db4658d92fb57cfa79 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/48272/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> checked as gist: 
> https://gist.github.com/joerg84/2426fca01ef09bb4af6454afa28faa56
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joerg Schad
> 
>

Reply via email to