-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42181/#review117492
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/tests/cluster.cpp (lines 409 - 430)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/42181/#comment178690>

    instead of doing if else blocks can you use a ternary operator for the 1st 
argument in the constructor?
    
    ```
    slave.slave = new Slave::Slave(
      id.isSome() ? id.get() : process::ID::generate("slave"),
      ...
      ...);
    ```
    
    infact instead of declaring an overloaded constructor in slave.hpp and 
chaining constructors, can you make 'id' an argument with default value?
    
    ```
    Slave(...,
          const std::string& id = process::ID::generate("slave"))
    ```
    
    Thoughts?


- Vinod Kone


On Jan. 22, 2016, 8:27 p.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42181/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 22, 2016, 8:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4255
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4255
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This change adds a constructor to Slave that takes in the process ID string 
> as an argument. This is necessary for testing recovery of HTTP based 
> executors. (Previously, every invocation of `StartSlave` used to generate a 
> new ID via `ID::generate`). There was no process delegate set via 
> `process::initialize` that led to problems for the existing HTTP based 
> executor to connect back to the slave.
> 
> Also, modified the tests to introduce a new `StartSlave` function that takes 
> this process ID as argument.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp b7586ce42bfac9d9885a3eb8d82deb94680c236c 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 90d0fecd2d83fd174134870a577ac59d79c0006f 
>   src/tests/cluster.hpp 576dcb8b7e27d1905425aa0f7cb319c19c17c15c 
>   src/tests/cluster.cpp 1a3a038e78999bca2fc3f08725f4ffaf4290bcb9 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp 3d9ebc6c9dc3cd1be02dc3771fbd847386907fac 
>   src/tests/mesos.cpp 365ebe8335c37bfdb983a5424d4c995fa9b76a22 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42181/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to