> On Nov. 13, 2015, 9:59 p.m., Jie Yu wrote: > > include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto, line 75 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/39985/diff/3/?file=1120023#file1120023line75> > > > > Can we call it ReserveResources to match other ACLs? (also, in case we > > have other things that we want to reserve in the future).
Thanks Jie, good call! I'm currently updating the other patches in the chain to accomodate this change. - Greg ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39985/#review106509 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 13, 2015, 11:11 p.m., Greg Mann wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/39985/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 13, 2015, 11:11 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Jie Yu, Michael Park, and Till Toenshoff. > > > Bugs: MESOS-3062 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3062 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Introduced ACL protobuf definitions for dynamic reservation. > Note: this review is continued from https://reviews.apache.org/r/37002/ > > > Diffs > ----- > > include/mesos/authorizer/authorizer.proto > 86bbb45f9d91b4098a262e3e50a793f3bb39497e > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39985/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > This is the first in a chain of 5 patches. `make check` was used to test at > the end of the chain. > > Note: documentation for these changes is included in > https://reviews.apache.org/r/40271/ > > > Thanks, > > Greg Mann > >
