> On June 9, 2015, 10:36 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote: > > src/master/master.cpp, line 3511 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35118/diff/1/?file=980131#file980131line3511> > > > > Isn't this a bit harsh? Shouldn't we log a warning and return instead? > > Also, could this be done earlier on?
Harshness: I think it's fine a) because it's internal communication not involving the frameworks and b) it's a new message handler so backwards compatibility is covered. Done earlier on: Agreed, will change this in a new review. (This one is already committed, sorry I haven't flagged it as such). > On June 9, 2015, 10:36 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote: > > src/master/master.cpp, lines 3513-3514 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/35118/diff/1/?file=980131#file980131line3513> > > > > Does it make sense to point to some documentation (if it exists > > already, or inline) about how this resource math will work? Can you suggest something here? FWIW I also updated the comment on `totalResources`: ``` // The current total resources of the slave. Note that this is // different from 'info.resources()' because this also considers // operations (e.g., CREATE, RESERVE) that have been applied and // includes revocable resources as well. Resources totalResources; ``` - Jiang Yan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35118/#review87234 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 5, 2015, 2:09 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/35118/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 5, 2015, 2:09 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2776 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2776 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > - This way Master::Slave::totalResources includes revocable resources, which > we need for metrics for revocable resources. > - Changed updateSlave() argument to use `const Resources& > oversubscribedResources` instead of `const std::vector<Resource>& > oversubscribedResources` because `Resources` provides convenience methods > such as `revocable()`. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/master/master.hpp deeb0d8c87a13315206556e1d0974cdd13e8224f > src/master/master.cpp be0db42da3c59761aa154439653d715556465256 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/35118/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check. > > > Thanks, > > Jiang Yan Xu > >
