----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34295/#review84361 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! docs/committers.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/34295/#comment135574> What is the expectation on "timely"? docs/committers.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/34295/#comment135573> +1 We should probably make it clear how maintainers are ordered and the suggested proceedure for contacting them regarding feedback i.e., should I simultaneously blast BH, VK, BM and JY repeatedly until I get timely feedback about a Master/Slave related review? docs/committers.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/34295/#comment135571> I don't see a need to call out the Isolators specifically; is "Mesos Containerizer" sufficient? - Ian Downes On May 15, 2015, 3:25 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/34295/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 15, 2015, 3:25 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Dave Lester, Ian Downes, > Jie Yu, Niklas Nielsen, Till Toenshoff, Timothy Chen, Vinod Kone, and Jiang > Yan Xu. > > > Bugs: MESOS-2737 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2737 > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Per the proposal thread, this adds documentation for maintainers and an > initial set of maintainers. > > Please share your thoughts! > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/committers.md PRE-CREATION > docs/home.md 4b8e7f8d2dcd9e26816353c939a2a5c18314ac45 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34295/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Markdown: https://gist.github.com/bmahler/962d1ddc9f14e1d342a6 > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
