Steve Carlin has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/23691 )

Change subject: IMPALA-14434: Calcite planner: implement partition key scan 
optimization
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23691/1/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/rel/node/ImpalaHdfsScanRel.java
File 
java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/rel/node/ImpalaHdfsScanRel.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/23691/1/java/calcite-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/calcite/rel/node/ImpalaHdfsScanRel.java@122
PS1, Line 122:             
SingleNodePlanner.createOptimizedPartitionUnionNode(nodeId, impalaPartitions,
> Why is this (and createAcidJoinNode) part of SingleNodePlanner rather than
SingleNodePlanner is part of the original planner and both of these methods are 
also called by the original planner.  Whereas NodeCreationUtils is specific to 
Calcite.

Would a rename here be better for NodeCreationUtils?  Or perhaps I should move 
those methods out of SingleNodePlanner into some kind of static shared class to 
lighten the amount of code in SingleNodePlanner?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/23691
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7b5b8a8115f65f6be27a5be0e19f21eebab61a32
Gerrit-Change-Number: 23691
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Steve Carlin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aman Sinha <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Fang-Yu Rao <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joe McDonnell <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pranav Lodha <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Steve Carlin <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 21:12:10 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to