Daniel Becker has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/22605 )

Change subject: IMPALA-13738 (Part1): Denormalize IcebergTable.getPartialInfo()
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(4 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/22605/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/22605/1//COMMIT_MSG@10
PS1, Line 10: removes the dependency on the internal hdfsTable_
Does this patch already remove the dependency or just reduce it?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/22605/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/IcebergTable.java
File fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/IcebergTable.java:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/22605/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/IcebergTable.java@774
PS1, Line 774: wantPartitionInfo
In the previous code, these infos were only given if "partIds != null", it it 
intentional that now also 'wantPartitionInfo' enables it?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/22605/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/IcebergTable.java@800
PS1, Line 800: -1
Is it intentional that this is changed from part.getLastCompactionId()?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/22605/1/fe/src/main/java/org/apache/impala/catalog/IcebergTable.java@838
PS1, Line 838: table_info
Can this be NULL? We've already set some of its fields earlier. We could 
convert it into a Preconditions check.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/22605
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I75d277fb555d0088a2e28111ff529a4605d734fa
Gerrit-Change-Number: 22605
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Noemi Pap-Takacs <npaptak...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Daniel Becker <daniel.bec...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <impala-public-jenk...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Steve Carlin <scar...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:34:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to