Kurt Deschler has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/21277 )

Change subject: IMPALA-12988: Calculate an unbounded version of CpuAsk
......................................................................


Patch Set 7:

(5 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21277/7/be/src/scheduling/scheduler.cc
File be/src/scheduling/scheduler.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21277/7/be/src/scheduling/scheduler.cc@1210
PS7, Line 1210: in at
nit: change to "is with"


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21277/7/be/src/scheduling/scheduler.cc@1210
PS7, Line 1210: is
nit: remove "is" or change to "that is"


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21277/7/be/src/scheduling/scheduler.cc@1211
PS7, Line 1211: scheduler only assign
nit: "the schedule would only assign"


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21277/7/be/src/scheduling/scheduler.cc@1213
PS7, Line 1213:         // dominant plan subtree ('dominant_instance_count' is 
0).
Comment/terminology is overall hard to follow here. Is this referring to any 
fragment that would include the coordinator? Unclear why rounding up is the 
neccesary action.


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21277/7/common/thrift/Query.thrift
File common/thrift/Query.thrift:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21277/7/common/thrift/Query.thrift@133
PS7, Line 133: Scheduler
nit: The scheduler



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/21277
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: Impala-ASF
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5441e31088f90761062af35862be4ce09d116923
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21277
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Abhishek Rawat <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: David Rorke <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Impala Public Jenkins <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kurt Deschler <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Riza Suminto <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:14:48 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to