Hi Christian, Normally I would post this as a separate issue (feature request), but it could be technically related. Would it be possible/feasible to switch to CommonMark? We'd love to make better use of RB screen real estate in the Description (we populate it by the API, and we put quite a lot of information/urls there, so the actual diffs are often off-screen). Being able to use extended syntax (like small text, see links below) will improve that a lot. https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/53801 https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/135909/158100 https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/348746/were-switching-to-commonmark
Kind regards, TW On Saturday, 8 May 2021 at 09:47:06 UTC+2 tw bert wrote: > A setting for allowed protocols would be great. > We run RB on our LAN only, so even a simple environment variable would > suffice. > For our use case, it does not need to be WAN hardened. > If you decide against it, can you point me to the source location? > We might just hack it into the code. > > About the support contract: No, not for now. > After writing quite a lot of custom tooling (via the api) to include RB in > our CI/CD, > we still have to iron out some issues, mostly related to performance. > So we are a bit past proof of concept, but also still investigating and > evaluating. > > Kind regards, TW > > > On Saturday, 8 May 2021 at 01:50:09 UTC+2 Christian Hammond wrote: > >> Hmm, that’s going to require some thought. We had to disallow arbitrary >> protocol schemes in order to address a security issue. We might be able to >> offer some kind of setting to add new schemes, but we’ll need to look into >> the options here. >> >> To check, does your company have a support contract with us? If so, we >> could expedite a pre-release build once we have something in place. >> >> Christian >> >> >> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 04:19 tw bert <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, unfortunately we need to downgrade back to 3.0.20, because we use >>> custom protocols in our markdown descriptions. Example: >>> >>> _Eclipse Hyperlinks:_ >>> >>> [my\_short\_demo.txt](eclipse:///openfile?workspace=TryoutEclipse&editor=default&window=1&line=0&offset=0&project=mercurial_xtryout&path=xtryout/my_short_demo.txt) >>> >>> Renders to clickable hyperlinks in 3.0.20, and to plain text in 3.0.23. >>> >>> Our dev machines have a custom protocol handler, that opens the file >>> inside a specific running eclipse instance (for the openfile command above, >>> but it's just an example). >>> >>> Anything we can do to fix this? >>> >>> Kind regards, TW >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Review Board Community" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/9cef4b99-9196-4137-bc2e-255f0c0429fbn%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/9cef4b99-9196-4137-bc2e-255f0c0429fbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- >> -- >> Christian Hammond >> President/CEO of Beanbag >> Makers of Review Board >> > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Review Board Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/5f3a0096-ca19-4429-bb6b-483bce0889d0n%40googlegroups.com.
