Gentoo patches to pip to prevent installation as the root user - so as to avoid package manager conflicts between emerge and pip.
To make it work, I'd need to install ReviewBoard packages as a non-root user. Certainly possible to make that work, but it starts to feel like just as many hoops as getting it to run that way as just putting together a docker image. I'd have to update the PYTHON_PATH Also, I was hoping someone might already have created some kind of Docker build file that does most of what I need, although nobody has piped up yet. Eric. On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Christian Hammond <christ...@beanbaginc.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Why not just install via our official Python packages? > > Christian > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:04 eric via Review Board Community < > reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 9:54:23 AM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:35 PM eric via Review Board Community < >>> revie...@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Christian, >>>> >>>> Thanks so much for the response. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, April 18, 2018 at 5:03:43 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It will, yes. You shouldn't need to make changes like that. This one >>>>> in particular will break applications that try using Djblets in various >>>>> ways. If this appears to fix packaging, then we really need to find out >>>>> what's really going on to break it in the first place. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I made some progress. Much closer. >>>> >>>> The Gentoo build that works with pip is mostly magic to me. I'm still >>>> trying to figure out the pieces. >>>> >>>> What I've figured out so far, is that as you suggest, I need to call >>>> setup.py (well, in a Gentoo ebuild, it is actually invoked via a wrapper >>>> command "esetup.py ..."). I have not yet gotten it to work, but I figured >>>> out several big steps forward. >>>> >>>> It would probably work better for Gentoo if setup.py develop was not a >>>> prerequisite to setup.py install. I see why you have it this way, but it >>>> makes it difficult to deal with. >>>> >>>> At the moment, I've figured out that I can patch out call the calls to >>>> _run_pip (which were triggering problems) - since the Gentoo environment >>>> already has the latest versions of those things installed. >>>> >>>> I'm tripping over the npm tool installation. While running package >>>> installs, Gentoo creates a sandbox, which prevents access to parts of the >>>> system that package install shouldn't normally need to touch. Looks like >>>> the Gentoo sandbox is preventing "npm install" from working. Trying to >>>> figure that out now. >>>> >>>> Since Gentoo mostly builds from source, I want to get it to work from >>>> the tar.gz distribution, but I can probably fall back to installing from >>>> the egg file, if I can't get this to work. Looks like the egg file has >>>> everything built as needed, and I wouldn't need to call "setup.py develop". >>>> >>> >>> >>> Eric, I'm not sure how similar Gentoo is to Fedora, but if you want to >>> have a look at how I'm doing the builds there, feel free to look at >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ReviewBoard/blob/3.0/ >>> f/ReviewBoard.spec and https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ >>> python-djblets/blob/1.0/f/python-djblets.spec >>> >>> I'm sort of "cheating" with the NPM build stuff. What I did was >>> pre-download all of the NPMs ahead of time and then I have the build just >>> untar the directory into the right place. This avoids issues like how the >>> Fedora build system disallows network access (to ensure repeatable builds). >>> It's also worth noting that the NPM bits are needed only at build-time and >>> don't end up in the built package. >>> >> >> After considering a bunch of different options, I've come to the >> conclusion that I should pursue a radically different path. Since my goal >> is not to build a generically useful ReviewBoard install for Gentoo, but >> instead to simply get it up and running inside my company's data center, >> I've concluded that setting up a Docker/Moby image and deploying that is >> likely to lead to a better result. >> >> Anyone with suggestions for where to start? >> >> Eric. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >> https://rbcommons.com/ >> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Review Board Community" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag > Makers of Review Board > > -- > Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: > https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: > https://rbcommons.com/ > Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Review Board Community" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/reviewboard/dp5Vne7fVhw/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Review Board Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
