The repo contains a lot of branches and "stuff" that we don't want to survey (and we don't want to make things to complicated for our users.... ho well...), so the repo path points directly to the "trunk" of our development. Too much history and not enough forward thinking at the time... Existing review requests are not a problem, this new instance of RB will start from scratch.
Matching files can be : - main.cpp - index.html - js/service.js (in a sub-directory) Le lundi 16 janvier 2017 11:31:45 UTC+1, Christian Hammond a écrit : > > The repository path should be pointing to the root of the repository > (probably /svn), rather than a subdirectory (/svn/trunk), but if you > already have a bunch of review requests in there, you probably have to keep > it as-is. > > Can you show me an example filename listed in the diff viewer that should > be matching? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> > Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> > > > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
