Hey Stephen, I haven't been able to look into this yet (and will be out for a few days), but is this something that we can patch in our tree? Or is it a bug in six?
If it's something we can fix in RBTools, then we can just fix it and get a new release out. Christian -- Christian Hammond - [email protected] Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]> Reply: [email protected] <[email protected]>> Date: June 19, 2015 at 7:21:19 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]>> Subject: Re: ImportError: No module named urllib.parse > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:04 PM John Schmitt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 1:33:55 PM UTC-7, Barret Rennie wrote: >> >>> Hi John, >>> >>> Yes thats what I mean. I’ll take a look at it. >>> >>> Can you tell me what version of six is installed? >>> >>> python-six-1.3.0-4.el7.noarch >> >> >> > > OK, so we have a problem here (and one I'm really embarassed not to have > noticed; I usually just bump and rebuild RBTools on EPEL 7 assuming it will > continue to work there the same way that it does on EPEL 6. > > Well, it turns out that EPEL 6 has a newer version of python-six than RHEL > 7 does, and RBTools is completely broken on the latter platform because of > it. (RHEL/CentOS 7.1 only ships with python-six 1.3.0 and the > six.move.urllib.parse support was added in python-six 1.4.0) > > The good news is that RHEL/CentOS 7.2 should include python-six 1.9.0[1]. > The bad news is that's a ways out, so this will be broken in the meantime. > > I have two choices: > 1) Revert RBTools back to a version prior to this requirement. That looks > like 0.6.3, which is almost certainly not a good idea. > 2) Ship RBTools broken in the standard repository and direct people to pull > an unofficial python-six package from a COPR repository. > > I'm going to go with 2) for now, updating the version of RBTools in EPEL to > have an explicit requirement on python-six >= 1.4 so that it won't be > installable without using my COPR repository until RHEL 7.2 is released. > > Given that RBTools has been broken like this for months, I suspect this > won't actually affect a great many people, but I'd still like to ask that > the Review Board devs add a note in the online documentation pointing > people to drop > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/EPEL7-rbtools/repo/epel-7/sgallagh-EPEL7-rbtools-epel-7.repo > into /etc/yum.repos.d until RHEL 7.2 is released. This repository will > contain only a rebased python-six package. > > It'll be available in a couple hours (right now, there's an unplanned > outage going on causing COPR builds to fail). > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185409 > > -- > Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: > https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ > Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: > https://rbcommons.com/ > Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "reviewboard" > group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
