On Sat, 2017-01-28 at 23:00 +0100, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Saturday, 2017-01-28 at 14:51:19 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Daniel Reichelt wrote: > > > I highly suspect this stems from packages' rules files supporting > > > reproducible builds. > > > I rather think this is due to binNMUs not modifying debian/changelog… > > (in the source package while it's modified in the binary packages…) > > This is completely counter intuitive. I'm using rsnapshot to backup a > few private machines. I will have to set up separate rsnapshots for > those parts of the backup that suffer from this <expletive>, to avoid > bogging down the data parts by unnecessary checksum calculations. > > This problem may affect many other backups too. Did anybody research > backup programs before this <expletive> was introduced to Debian?
Would reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org be the correct mailing list to discuss this? _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
