Hi Chris, On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:00 AM Chris Lamb <ch...@reproducible-builds.org> wrote: > > Hi Bo YU, > > I'm not involved in the day-to-day of maintaining the testing > framework so I'll have to leave a canonical reply to those who do. But > we are definitely interested in supporting more architectures in > theory, especially ones that a quite different to the ones we support > today. > > RISC-V would certainly match that description: not only because it > isn't "just" another ARM variant but because RISC-V is an open > standard and therefore philosophically aligns quite well with the > broader goals of reproducibility/bootstrappability etc.
It is great to hear about the reproducible-build will accept the RISC-V arch. > > In terms of the technical requirements, clearly we would need enough > RISC-V machines for use as builders and they would need to be fairly > powerful too. I'm not sure about numbers here, and whether virtual > machines could work; there are some variations we test for that might > need access to the bare metal... Ok, glad to know these facts. If there are any riscv hardware resources available here, I will update here and maybe need you or other r-b people to help setup it:) BR, Bo > > > Best wishes, > > -- > o > ⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb > o o reproducible-builds.org 💠 > ⬊ ⬋ > o > _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
