On 2021-09-16, Frédéric Pierret wrote: > Le 9/16/21 à 9:34 AM, Holger Levsen a écrit : >> given that https://debian.notset.fr/rebuild/results/unstable.amd64.html is > > May I add also https://debian.notset.fr/rebuild/results/unstable.all.html for > the "all" arch.
Would it be plausible to get a composite view with both amd64+all ? I'm also noticing a high number of binNMUs as not being reproducible, even when they're reproducible on tests.r-b.o (e.g. bash, coreutils), but almost no successfully reproduced binNMUs (only one i found at a quick look was pcb). >> really nice already and knowing that I wont have much time in the next two >> weeks (and really wanting to show real results for Debian now...) it occurred >> to me that we could point the dns entry for >> alpha.tests.reproducible-builds.org >> to debian.notset.fr and make that server serve those page as >> https://alpha.tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian and thus show some >> results NOW. >> >> What do you think? Frédéric (running notset.fr) liked the idea. > > Yes I confirm that :) Also happy to see more exposure of this milestone of rebuilding packages in the archive! :) There were earlier attempts from NYU, if I recall, but maybe issues with snapshot.debian.org interferred with making it reliable over time? >> And maybe we should use preview.t.r-b.o instead of alpha.t.r-b.o? Either sounds fine to me... Or practice.tests.r-b.o ... which sort of has dual meaning in the sense of "reproducible builds in practice vs. in theory" and also "we're practicing this new view of reproducible builds" live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
