hi, I dropped the bug from cc:...
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 07:10:47PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > I've read: > > https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org > > But did not see anything about what the process for a QA upload was... > Well, pabs pointed me to the devref and encouraged me to upload. I've added the link pabs gave to the above url. Also, regarding the discussion on #-qa last night: < themill> I wonder if we're at the stage where we should re-upload everything in Debian that was not built on the buildd so that it then is < vagrantc> yes. < themill> (probably everything that doesn't have a buildinfo file too) < vagrantc> yup. to which I replied after Vagrant left: < h01ger> every arch:any package not built on buildds got binNMU scheduled last year from ivodd_ < h01ger> not arch:all because you know why < themill> ah, good news < h01ger> (though since then there have been quite many binary uploads because of NEW which were not followed up with a source only upload. there was a mail thread somewhere (devel? release? qa?) somewhat recently (a month or so ago)) < themill> presumably those packages never migrated though < h01ger> yup -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C ⠈⠳⣄ "... the premise [is] that privacy is about hiding a wrong. It's not. Privacy is an inherent human right, and a requirement for maintaining the human condition with dignity and respect." (Bruce Schneier)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
