On Thu 2018-08-30 21:08:51 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > (replying to the list with Otto's permission..) > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 02:51:16AM +0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: >> This is what we talked about today: >> https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-3/commit/1460cfa128fb457b5b5c60fcc5cac6faf5a216d5 > > I'm wondering, is this really a good approach? (to set build-id=none) > > I'm somewhat sceptical but then also a bit clueless here... ;)
i'm also pretty ignorant about these details, but wouldn't that make it hard to find/match the debugging symbols? aiui, the build-id is used by gdb to find the symbols for debugging. for example: 0 dkg@alice:~$ file $(which notmuch) /usr/bin/notmuch: ELF 64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 3.2.0, BuildID[sha1]=ef8fab73e1088840f0c5abe7dcbdc5a1246272cd, stripped 0 dkg@alice:~$ dpkg -L notmuch-dbgsym | grep build-id.*debug$ /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ef/8fab73e1088840f0c5abe7dcbdc5a1246272cd.debug 0 dkg@alice:~$ does this mean that galera-3 debugging symbols won't be easily findable? then again, the debugging symbols for galera-3 look like they're being generated in a way that is pretty out-of-date, and hasn't been touched in at least 3 years, so maybe the maintainers don't care about these symbols very much: https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/galera-3/blame/master/debian/rules#L51 just my 2¢, --dkg _______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
