El divendres, 23 d’agost de 2019, a les 16:12:43 CEST, Harald Sitter va escriure: > Yo! > > What's our stance on tar names different from the repo names? > > For simplicity's sake I would argue it should not ever happen, but are > there practical reasons where we simply have to have it (other than > for legacy naming reasons)? > > And if we do have a need for this, should we maybe encode the tarname > in our repo-metadata json if it is different from the repo basename? > > Currently we don't really have the name map codified anywhere, which > is a bit annoying to me because for legacy reasons phonon-vlc.git is > actually released as phonon-backend-vlc but since that isn't codified > in our metadata releaseme doesn't know that, and neither does neon's > tooling (to map stuff the other way for git-master builds). > > Thoughts?
I don't think it really makes sense to make our lifes harder for no reason, I'd go for either rename the tar or the git repo. Cheers, Albert > > HS >
