Hey, I spotted the issue, that not all files under po directory are licensed the same way.
as example I use akonadi-notes/17.08.3 - spotted the issue also for 17.12.0. These three translations have a own license: grep -rl 'This file is distributed under the license LGPL version 2.1 or' po po/ca@valencia/akonadinotes5.po po/uk/akonadinotes5.po po/ca/akonadinotes5.po Some files don't have a license header. Not an issue at all, cause this means fall back to package license, but as most translations make it explicit, I think it makes sense to make it explicit for every translation. grep -rL 'This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.' po po/pt/akonadinotes5.po po/nb/akonadinotes5.po po/ca@valencia/akonadinotes5.po po/ja/akonadinotes5.po po/ga/akonadinotes5.po po/de/akonadinotes5.po po/lt/akonadinotes5.po po/sk/akonadinotes5.po po/bs/akonadinotes5.po po/uk/akonadinotes5.po po/fi/akonadinotes5.po po/it/akonadinotes5.po po/ca/akonadinotes5.po po/sr/akonadinotes5.po Also consider to get rid of the useless line: Copyright (C) 2014 This_file_is_part_of_KDE Either mark the copyright holder one person/group/etc. or remove it completely. Best regards, sandro
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
