El Dimarts, 12 de febrer de 2013, a les 22:05:00, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Tuesday 12 February 2013 15:28:35 Anke Boersma wrote: > > This whole thread was about stable tars, not RC or Beta. > > Sorry at least to me that was not obvious. (thread started on 31. of > January, doesn't mention minor releases, so I assumed it meant the upcoming > release of 4.10) - all I wrote so far was explicitly for the case of a > 4.x.0 release. > > What was found > > and reported often, is regressions from say, 4.x.2 to 4.x.3. > > Reported not in bug reports, but more a discussion on IRC, see if anyone > > was aware, sometimes ml, again, just checking if it was a known/accepted > > regression. > > status quo is that currently the branches are basically untested.
That is *your* thinking, i.e. you don't test them, but i think it is a bit off a stretch to present that as the reality. Although i agree more users of the stable branch would help. Cheers, Albert > Here > personally I would love to get more testing as I never like pushing to > branch (let's push to master, if nobody screams in two weeks, let's > backport). > > For this situation I would suggest to coordinate with the quality team (e.g. > Myriam). > > -- > Martin Gräßlin _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
