On Saturday 09 February 2013 23:08:50 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Of course another option is lifting the requirement for the pre-packages not > being publicly available, after all the packages will most likely be the > real thing, so if everyone agrees it is better lifting this requirement, we > can do it, the fact that *I* personally like it the way it is doesn't mean > it's the better way. With my bugzilla user hat on I'm afraid of that. It would mean we get bug reports for an unreleased version. That's bound to create confusion - we would not be able to trust the version field any more. In case of a re-spin it will get just worse - different tar balls with the same version information.
-- Martin Gräßlin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
