On Tuesday 22 November 2011 5:36:52 PM Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > On Tuesday 22 November 2011 18:42:46 Allen Winter wrote: > > > > Honestly, I'm not 100% in favor of the rock hard freeze approach in > > kdelibs. But the consensus is against me on that. So I have no power to > > reconsider. > > We are talking about an exceptional case here. This is not about adding any > new functionality, but about adding an entry point for users who are willing > to support the KDE community. So I don't think the hard freeze rules apply in > the same way as for other changes to the libraries. > > You say the consensuse is against you. I haven't heard any other opinions > against adding the patch than yours, though. So where exactly is the > consensus > of not adding the patch? > The consensus has been about hard freezing kdelibs.
If anyone from the Release Team wants to break the freeze for this particular patch they can speak up. > > Another approach might be to create a libkjtg and then put in a > > hard-dependency on that. maybe ?? > > Certainly not. This is a simple patch. > Not that simple. And stop attacking me everyone. I'm just the messenger. Sorry I responded at all _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
